
A Service Economy is one where instead of goods and services being sold to consumers, they are leased. I am over simplifying for the sake of getting the point across. Currently we buy tires for our car, we buy our car, home appliances, computers, etc., etc. The list of things that we buy that in reality are beyond our capacity to fully deal with in terms of getting rid of at the end of their life cycle is HUGE.
In a Service Economy the responsibility for their full life cycle falls on the manufacturer. For instance, you buy a dishwasher and after 7 years of service it craps out and the cost to repair is hardly less than the purchase of a new machine. If the manufacturer has leased the machine to you, knowing full well that at the end of its life or if it needs to be upgraded or repaired, this responsibility is on them to take care of it. This has a profound effect, then on the way things are made and the materials used in there manufacturing. If the manufacturer knows it is responsible in this way, a shift in perception of the product (or in this new case the service) value occurs. And by doing so, the service item would be made to offer the best quality, utility, and performance. This also creates a closed manufacturing loop and instills a level of stewardship on the part of the manufacturer to create services with the least toxic and most recyclable materials.
From Wikipedia...
In some countries, such as Germany, law requires attention to the comprehensive outcome of the whole extraction, production, distribution, use and waste of a product, and holds those profiting from these legally responsible for any outcome along the way. This is also the trend in the UK and EU generally. In the United States, there have been many class action suits that are effectively product stewardship liability - holding companies responsible for things the product does which it was never advertised to do.
Rather than let liability for these problems be taken up by the public sector or be haphazardly assigned one issue at a time to companies via lawsuits, many accounting reform efforts focus on achieving full cost accounting. This is the financial reflection of the comprehensive outcome - noting the gains and losses to all parties involved, not just those investing or purchasing. Such moves have made moral purchasing more attractive, as it avoids liability and future lawsuits.
I think that if the US govt. attempted to create a law like that in Germany (Which I would agree with) it would probably alienate and polarize the topic in ways that would not benefit the end user, specifically us, the customers. Perhaps instead consumers should demand such a service by the manufactures. Speak with your wallet.
No comments:
Post a Comment